A rainy redoubt and a surprise artifact of the day

The rain today meant we couldn’t effectively excavate. So we are indoors and keeping up on the artifact washing and processing, and some more classroom instruction. We were fortunate to get all the artifacts we recovered to date washed and drying on the racks by lunch, and the material we washed the other day was bagged up and brought up to the classroom so we could begin to analyse it in more detail. Hooray!

There’s a little fox that we have seen a couple times hanging around the Archaeology Centre!
After the digging and cleaning is now the fun part, where you need to figure out what things are, what they were used for, who used them, and if you are lucky, how old they are!
Artifact analysis is probably something you will enjoy if you like sorting and organising things together based on various properties.
The rest of our crew spent the afternoon with James learning some principles of mapping, relational databases, knowledge management, and some of the math you need to figure out coordinates.

In the process of washing today, this year’s students helped me to solve a mystery that has been puzzling me for the last year or so. Because we often find only parts of objects, often they remain enigmas, a tantalising hint at something more that is never realised.

Last year when I was working on the analysis of the artifacts from BcGn-17, I came across some blue transfer print ceramic pieces. One was a segment of an interlocking lozenge border, quite distinctive from the other dishes I had come to be familiar with. The other was what I was convinced was the feet of a bear. It was a tiny fragment of an animal’s feet, but something just said bear to me about it. I put it aside after recording, thinking that I would never know what pattern that piece came from.

There was one set of material from last year that had been overlooked from last season. This was recovered inside the root cellar/drain feature that they worked so hard to uncover! As this year’s students tackled that collection of bricks, nails, a spoon, bones, and other fragments, I saw a flash of familiar blue lozenge pattern and the back of an animal….

New fragment of blue transfer print refined white earthenware!

We also had some writing “_UINE RUSS_”. Genuine Russian…what? Something to do with a bear?

Turns out those fragments I had been finding were not tableware, but the lid to a jar of bear grease, which purports to help Victorian men achieve their hirsute dreams. Bears grease first appears as a remedy for thinning or balding hair in the middle of the 17th century. Prior to this, most fashionable men wore powdered curly wigs, which meant that it didn’t really matter what your natural hair looked like. The new emergent male hairstyles were short, neatly trimmed and flawlessly groomed. The ideal hair colour was dark brown or black instead of a powdered white or greying natural hair, and texture was thick with no thinning or balding. By the mid to late 1800s, hair restoration and dye products were marketed and eagerly consumed by both men and women.

Why bear grease? I assume because of some sort of sympathetic magic, since bears are strong, and have shaggy, healthy coats (well, usually – don’t do an internet search for a bear with mange if you want to be able to sleep), their grease must help to engender that property when applied to other hair? Russian bears must be extra hairy, powerful and virile! This cosmetic appears to mostly fall out of production around the end of the Victorian Era, but it does linger on in the Atkinson’s catalogue until the end of WW1.

This lid is black transfer print, but it is pretty close to our example.

Now whether or not our container actually contained genuine Russian bear grease is another question! The fat was often not from bears (Russian or otherwise), but goose, pig, or beef tallow. In order to combat the heavy unpleasant smell, it was sometimes scented with essential oils or herbs. The fashion to dress hair with oily odoriferous substances is part of the reason why antimacassars or special cloths were invented to have on the back of upholstered furniture so that the grease from dressed hair (macassar oil, bear grease, or otherwise) wasn’t soaking in to expensive and hard to clean furniture!

Our pot of grease appears to be generic with no named branding on it, but based on similar examples online I would guess our pot dates from the 1860s-1880s. This coincidentally supports our current idea that the feature excavated is a root cellar from a structure that was abandoned once the “new” brick house was built some time in the later 1800s on the site. The leftover bricks, rubble, and other by that point non-fashionable ceramic dishes etc., plus a hair remedy might have been conveniently gotten rid of in the old root cellar. Certainly someone in this household was concerned with thinning hair and determined to do something about it but perhaps on the down low.

Tomorrow is looking like rain as well, so we shall flip our groups and do the same thing again!

At dawn we….plan??

We’re at the point of the excavation where it is getting interesting because we are moving from unknowns to knowns (or at least what we think we know!), and making predictions and testing hypotheses. Now that the upper layer has been removed from most of the excavation units, we are getting down to the levels that might hold some clues about the construction and destruction of this house, and maybe a little bit about the people who lived here.


We had a visit today by Dr Robert Pearce, a Trent MA alumnus from the 1970s and now retired archaeologist. He visited us last at BcGn-17 almost exactly two years ago! I should have taken a picture but I was too busy playing tour guide. Thanks for visiting Bob, it is always a pleasure to see you!


This season we are following a context-based excavation strategy. Our last two seasons at this site have shown us that large parts do seem to be intact in a complicated stratigraphic sequence. This means that instead of taking the unit down in arbitrary levels, it is intact enough that we can basically unpeel it in reverse order of how it was formed. So as contexts are exposed, we photograph, plan, and then decide which context is the most recent, as it will come out first before the older material. Some times we guess wrong, and a context that looks like it is lying on top of another might turn out to be the same in the end, or we find out that it has been disturbed, which made it very difficult to unpack the sequence.

It has a different workflow from excavating bulk material out by level. We assumed when we first began at this site that it had been so heavily disturbed that there was no intact stratigraphy, so we decided to remove materials in arbitrary levels so we could capture a general idea of older and younger artifacts on the site. Since our site actually seems to have a preserved stratigraphic sequence, we are targeting the digging to remove certain parts of a unit, cleaning of the surface to better see the exposure of new contexts, and then a lot of recording, some pondering, and then back to digging again. It slows things down but this type of excavation lets us capture the intricacies of what goes together in what sequence, the relationship between the parts of the excavated material and where things came from.


The Snakes (first to be assigned the mapping exercise!) collected all their data points by the end of the day yesterday. Their task today was to convene in the Archaeology Centre lab and learn how to convert their degree and distance measurements into coordinates, which they could then use to make a map of the artifact scatter. Sorry there are no pictures but imagine intense concentration, some hair pulling/head scratching, and finally at the end a neat and tidy map!

The Foxes (Mischa, Grace, Konrad, Lucas, Dee, and Danielle) started the morning by finishing up the plan of their excavation unit. They report that it was easier today and maybe not the torment they first thought it was when starting yesterday.
The Bears have wild topography in their unit, so the planning frames weren’t much use in trying to draw the plan of the removed destruction layer.
Yet more planning by the Foxes and Bears! The yellow squares are 1m planning frames, subdivided by the red elastic into 20cm segments. This makes planning at a 1:20 scale quite quick, as one of those red squares corresponds to 1cm on their graph paper.
The Bears switched to using tapes, a reference line and a plumb bob so they could record the positions of the giant boulders at the base of their unit.
Another vital step is taking elevation data. Here Danielle is holding the reflector, which is used with the totalstation to record a reflected laser beam to calculate where in 3D space it is in reference to the base unit.
The Ladybugs (Jazmine, Cole, Kendra, Hailey and Hannah) finished removing the context 1 from their unit and tidied up the walls so that it was complete. James switched them to the mapping exercise, and began by demonstrating how to set up the theodolites.
The planning and photographing and assigning new contexts was finally done, and digging could begin again, this time the goal to remove the fill that is pushed up against and in between the exposed wall contexts. Grace found out firsthand (without injury!) that surprise!, there is a void in the middle of the Fox unit as least as deep as her left shin as that is how far her leg fell down into the hole.
The Ladybugs continued collecting their data points while James helped them with questions.
Foxes Dee, Konrad, Grace, and Mischa removing context 107 while Lucas screens in the background. The oval hole in the middle in front of Konrad’s feet is Grace’s impromptu sondage.
The Bears added on a 1 x 3m unit to the south end of their excavation extent and made excellent work in removing context 1. The purpose of this is to hopefully expose the top of the southern wall segment. This unit is very complicated stratigraphically, and James is looking forward to puzzling this out with the Bears!

Tomorrow we will be doing labwork of various sorts as it looks like it will rain the entire day. So please check back in for some dispatches from the Arch Centre, where we have a smorgasbord of activities for our students to select from including more artifact washing, primary artifact processing, secondary artifact processing/analysis, digitization/GIS, and mapping.

The dawn of week two!

We’re back after a weekend off. Everyone arrived to site this morning ready to get back at things. We hauled all the equipment out of the trailer and set back up on site. Now that everyone generally knows what they are doing now, the real work begins. Here are some snapshots from the day.

Students setting up digital theodolites in a field.
Since the Snakes finished their excavation unit first for now, James switched them over to a mapping exercise. The first step is learning how to set up the digital theodolites, in particular, how to set them up level over a datum point.
Students standing in an excavation unit. A portion of stone wall made from fieldstone cobbles is visible in the lower left corner.
The Foxes cleaned up their unit in preparation to do a plan drawing of the various new contexts that have been revealed as they removed Context 1 from the unit.
The Ladybugs are digging in a large 3mx3m excavation unit.
The Ladybugs continued working steadily on their unit. This unit has produced a fair amount of material that might tell us a bit about the people who lived in this house.
A fairly substantial chunk of wall has appeared in the Foxes unit, which is pretty exciting. This might be the northeast corner of the house!
It’s fun to see what artifacts are popping up in the various layers. This one is a fragment of plate with a registry mark on it which tells us the pattern was registered in 1934.
The Bears are finally tackling the destruction layer of debris that has been pushed into their unit some point after the superstructure of the house was removed.
The Snakes continuing on their mapping quest, now that they have set up the instruments, they are using them to record the location of points simulating an artifact scatter.
How many Bears fit into an excavation unit? At least four! The Bears moved an enormous amount of rocks and dirt today, bravo!
The Foxes spent the rest of the afternoon planning their unit. The digging is only a part of the time on a site, there is a lot of documentation and paperwork that happens before, during and after the digging part!

We made great progress today! It’s looking like tomorrow is going to be really nice weather before a couple days of steady rain, so here’s hoping we can continue to make progress.

End of Week One!

It’s hard to believe we are at the end of the first week of field school already. This morning dawned quite chilly, it seems that we are constantly putting on and taking off layers depending on the wind and when the sun comes out. But once digging is underway everyone seems to be at a reasonable operating temperature. I think everyone agrees that this is much preferable to the humidity and heat we will get later in the summer! The bug situation hasn’t been too bad yet as well, although the blackflies are starting to appear.

The Foxes spent the morning busily trying to get the new excavation area they had staked out yesterday down to the same level as the rest of the unit.
It’s looking like their decision was a good one, as we have a quite substantial wall segment with a potential return appearing. How this relates to the structure is something they are eager to work out.
The Ladybugs are continuing to battle roots but are encountering hints that they are coming down onto their next context.

Some of our groups have finished uncovering their first context, so they are learning some new skills like how to draw a plan of the excavation unit, how to complete a context form, and how to capture coordinates in three dimensions using a totalstation to map in the corners of the unit and the elevation of the exposed excavation.

The Bears had their work cut out for them, with a very complicated exposure with lots of information to record.
They steadily worked through the morning and managed to get the plan drawing done, which means on Monday after they take their elevations they can start removing this destruction layer and we can see what is underneath!
The Snakes have exposed three new contexts in their excavation unit, which they have documented in their plan drawings.
The Snakes also used the totalstation to capture the elevation data of the exposed excavation surface. On Monday, they’ll be able to start taking out the next context of material.

As it is Friday, we packed up the site completely just before lunch, and met at the Archaeology Centre to start processing some of the artifacts we recovered over the past two days of excavation. We’ve had more than expected (although not nearly as much as our excavations at BcGn-23 in 2024) so we need to keep on top of it so we aren’t overwhelmed.

Lab day is always fun, because you get to see the material you collected actually clean and sometimes artifacts reveal new details that you didn’t notice before when they were caked with dirt. I was hearing a lot of “when did we find THIS??” and “Oh that’s so cool!” as the washing went on. Cleaned artifacts are laid out on trays (in varying degrees of coherence and organisation depending on the proclivities of the washer!) where they can dry.

Artifact washing in the wet lab.
We are such a big group we are also in the adjoining seminar room!

Once dry, they are ready for primary processing, which means they will be separated by material type, counted, and bagged with a provisional tag. Their next destination is up to the department, where with the help of student volunteers, I catalogue and analyse the material for our archaeological site reports. Depending on how the excavations go this season, we might even begin this step before field school ends. Our minimum goal is to have everything washed and primary processing done at the very least by the end of the field school.

Other lab duties that will start to be incorporated include digitising the site plans after they are drawn and managing the GIS of the site excavation.


The artifact of the day today is this little guy, who had been intriguing me since yesterday, when someone showed it to me in the field. I thought it looked like a bee, and once it was cleaned it became apparent it was celluloid plastic, and had been broken and exposed to heat.

Our mystery bee, somewhat the worse for wear!

This is a Japanese-produced celluloid toy included in a box of Cracker Jack, most likely dating from the late 1940s-1950s. These waxed paper boxes of red, white and blue contained popped corn and peanuts covered in a molasses-based caramel. While caramel-covered popcorn was a popular street vended snack in the later 1800s, by 1896 the F. Rueckheim & Brother Company had perfected the manufacturing to keep the individual kernels from welding together into a block and were trading under the name Cracker Jack (slogan: “The more you eat, the MORE you want!”). By 1899 they had innovated a new type of waxed cardboard packaging, called triple-proof because it was proof against dust, germs, and moisture. This really was an innovation because prior to this, packaging was either in bulk, or heavy and expensive metal tins or glass bottles/jars. The popularity of Cracker Jack was immediate, including immortalising the name in the 1908 hit song, Take Me Out To The Ball Game, where the baseball-mad Katie Casey implores her beau to “Buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jack, I don’t care if I never get back”. The first mascots of the company were some anthropomorphic bears, but the iconic Sailor Jack mascot and his dog Bingo appeared by 1916 and remain to this day.

Cracker Jack began including free surprises in their boxes in 1912. The earliest items were small metal toys and charms produced in Japan. By the 1940s, they were mostly celluloid charms and trinkets.

1950s era ad showing some of the toys you could get.

I was able to find a complete bee/wasp in a cream colour, which was fun. It looks like they came in blue, red and green also. From what I can glean, this would have been considered a premium toy because it was one of the larger ones to be included.

Our bee/wasp in much better condition!

We also have found a second Cracker Jack toy, a Great Plains Native American man wearing warbonnet regalia sending smoke signals. This also dates to the 1950s, and is most likely the result of the popularity of Westerns, which made up 25% of American film during the 1940s-1960s. The post-1960s era then saw a proliferation of television Westerns, but this genre dwindles and almost disappears by the 1970s. Finding these artifacts is really important, because this is a pretty good indicator that there were some children living in this house in the 1940s-1950s, so we can assume it was still a domestic space at that time and had not been repurposed into a more industrial or commercial use before it was destroyed.

Later inclusions in Cracker Jack include temporary tattoos, games, pencil sharpeners, drawing blocks covered in black wax that you would scratch off to make a drawing in the revealed rainbow background, tiny books, and a highly-coveted magnifying lens which every kid knows was never used to magnify anything except the sun.

Cracker Jack toys of the vintage I remember as a kid…

Cracker Jack is still around today, but the “prizes” are simply stickers and a URL for Cracker Jack themed arcade games you can play online.


I think everyone is pretty tired and sore, but we have had an excellent first week and after the week-end to recover we are ready to begin again bright and early on Monday!

Artifact of the Day, May 7th 2026 – Garnet Ring

We had just set up and started digging for our second day when I heard the news pass through site, rippling downwards towards me. “They found a ring! A gold ring!”. They in this case are the Bears, who in clearing up the upper context of the bulldozed and destroyed structure scooped up a ring, which perhaps like the One Ring had been temporarily trapped awaiting its chance to walk freely in the world again! Glinting in the screen, there it suddenly was!

This appears to be a man’s signet ring of some kind, set with a red stone. The inner band of the ring has a 10K gold hallmark, and a sentimental inscription in cursive.

10K gold is a mixture of 41.7% pure gold and 58.3% other metals. Since pure gold is so soft, this particular mixture of strengthening metals makes for a highly durable ring that is suitable for daily wear. It does also mean this ring was less expensive to purchase than a pure gold ring. The stone is likely a garnet (originally granat), a mineral composed of mainly silica. The name of this gemstone originates from a 14th-century Middle English/Old French word gernet (dark red) and the Latin granatus or granatium (meaning a grain or seed). This is also related to the name for pomegranate (pomum granatum) referring to the red jewel-like seeds of the fruit.

Historically, garnets were considered to have protective properties and were carried by travellers as talismans to help guide them. They also were worn by warriors to boost confidence and strength. In more modern times, garnet is the birthstone for January and is traditionally associated with the heart, strong emotions, and life force, representing deep passion, commitment and loyalty. The band is a signet style, which often denotes power, authority and heritage, stemming from when rings like this were used to approve documents or apply as a seal to a decision. Certainly it combines potent symbolism, and part of what we do as archaeologists is unpack the meaning or semiotics behind these symbols. We’ll take a closer look when we have a lab day and see if we can glean anything more.

As for its life before it passed into our hands, we can only speculate…


Our students made excellent progress today. We’ve busted out the shovels, the mattocks and the trowels and the screens are singing as they sift the dirt. The site is alive with laughter and conversation.

Some excavation plans have not survived first engagement with reality and have required some pondering and decisions to change strategy. We have exposed some new features that instead of answering questions, have compounded the confusion. It’s a glorious mess at the moment and we are having a lot of fun.

The Ladybugs (Cole, Jazmine, Hannah, Kendra, Shanti, Hailey) have been industriously exploring their unit, which has provided some artifacts that may feature in upcoming blog posts!
The Bears (Tony, Hazel, David, Makayla, Kaitlyn, and Carly) with their very stratigraphically complicated unit.
Not the Cracks of Doom, but the most recent home for our ring nonetheless! A lot of painstaking work today by the Bears teasing soil from many rocks.
The Snakes (Johanna, Cristian, Jocelyn, Rajiv, Jay, and Sarah) have several underlying contexts appearing and a strange concrete wall that is not aligned with how we think the main structure is oriented. This unit is also a bit of a mystery.
The Foxes (Dee, Lucas, Grace, Danielle, Mischa, Konrad) have also been a little foxed by the non-appearance of an expected wall, so they have decided to extend their excavation east to encompass a wall-like arrangement of stones just outside their unit to see if things make a little more sense.

See you tomorrow!